Using RMDs to Assess Asset Allocation

PUBLISHED Oct 18, 2022, 11:40:04 AM        SHARE

imgFiPhysician Blog

Using RMDs to Assess Asset Allocation

Asset Allocation Using RMDs

Can you use RMDs to help determine your asset allocation in the retirement drawdown phase?

Imagine you are living off your assets (taking an income from your nest egg). What might your asset allocation be to minimize the sequence of returns risk due to RMDs?

Like most traditional DIY investors, you have had an asset allocation for your entire investing career. Should that asset allocation change now that you are in the drawdown phase, also known as the retirement withdrawal or distribution phase?

Asset Allocation during Drawdown

This is a more theoretical discussion. See Asset Allocation Five Years from Retirement if you want an actual number.

Let’s discuss asset allocation using RMDs. Like asset allocation in accumulation, it is not a simple answer. Or rather, unlike asset allocation in accumulation, you don’t hear many people consider anything beyond an ultra-conservative 30/70 type of portfolio like you see in target-date funds.

If you want to understand your asset allocation during drawdown, how can Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) help inform your decision?

Some folks must take RMDs even if they don’t need them. So if we look at RMDs, how does that inform our asset allocation in the drawdown phase?

RMD Asset Allocation Strategy

Even if you have oversaved for retirement, once RMDs begin, you must start withdrawals from your pre-tax retirement accounts every year, even if you don’t want the money!

What should your asset allocation be given these unnecessary RMDs? This is an important consideration, as most gloss over this topic or suggests 50/50, or 30/70, or the like.

But what if we decide first how much “Safer Money” we need just to take out the RMDs? After all, we don’t need the money. So then, how aggressively can you invest (asset allocation strategy) for unneeded RMDs?

Asset Allocation for RMDs

How aggressive can our asset allocation be in an IRA when we know unnecessary RMDs are coming?

Do you want to avoid selling equities when they are down? For example, if the market has crashed and you have to take your RMD, it might be nice to have some “Safer Money” you can withdraw instead of selling stocks.

So, how much Safer Money do you need in your pre-tax retirement accounts (henceforward called IRAs) to prevent RMDs from forcing you to sell low?

We know the market can be down for a long duration before it recovers. But, since you are forced to take distributions, what percentage of your pre-tax retirement accounts do you need in “Safer Money” (cash and bonds) to not sell equities when they are down?

I will use the new RMD table below, so we might as well introduce it now.

New RMD Table in 2022

The RMD table changed in 2022. Have a look:

RMD Table

Above, you can see “old” and “new” RMD calculations starting at age 72. This is the uniform life table updated for 2022; most folks use it to calculate their yearly RMD percentage.

The “old” RMD factor at age 72 is 25.6, and the “new” one is 27.4. This means you used to be forced to take 3.91% of your pre-tax money at age 72, and now it is 3.65%. Not a big difference, but it is a 6.65% decrease.

The new uniform life table considers that folks are living longer and thus “need” to withdraw at a slower pace to account for longevity. Of course, most folks take out more than their RMD every year… but those folks are not my typical audience.

Now that we know the new RMDs in 2022, let’s discuss sequence risk and how much safer money you might want in your pre-tax retirement accounts.

Sequence Risk and RMDs

If you have oversaved for retirement, you may aggressively invest in your IRA.

While you should de-risk before retirement, if you don’t “need” the money, you can invest aggressively in your 70s and 80s for your kids or charity. As I say, at that point, asset allocation concerns the tradeoffs of sleeping well at night vs. making the kids rich.

Since you are forced to take out RMDs every year (whether you want to or not), there are unique sequence risk considerations.

Usually, when we talk about Sequence of Returns Risk, we talk about the five years before and ten years after you start portfolio withdrawals in retirement.

Here, we are talking about forced pre-tax distribution due to RMDs. These are fully taxable.

If you are forced to sell equities when they are down (because you have no “Safer Money” in your IRA—after all, you are aggressively invested since you don’t need the money), then a couple of bad years might impede the overall returns.

So, if you must take out 30% of your IRA in the next couple of years, should you have at least that amount in “Safer Money,” or is it ok to be 100% stocks? How much safer money do you need from the forced RMDs, and what should your asset allocation be due to RMDs?

Let’s answer that question in a second, but first, is RMD sequence risk an issue of fungibility or taxes?

Consider the fungibility of your IRA and brokerage accounts for a second.

Wait, What about money’s Fungibility in my IRA and Brokerage Account?

I might lose some people here, but that’s ok. Skip this section if you aren’t a nerd.

When RMDs force you to sell pre-tax equities when they are down, you cannot “just” adjust your overall asset allocation to make up for it.

Yes, money is fungible, and the inverse of the above is true. But while your brokerage account is fungible with your IRA, your IRA is not fungible with your brokerage account because of taxation.

First, if you are forced to sell equities from your brokerage account when the market is down, you can adjust your overall asset allocation and be fine. Fungible.

As an example, think about this for a second:

You need cash from your brokerage account, but it is 100% equities (as you might see if you have a good asset location strategy). So if the market is down and you sell stocks low, aren’t you committing the cardinal sin of investing by selling low and locking in losses?

No, not really. Say you have bonds in your IRA. You can exchange some of those bonds for stocks while you sell the stocks in your brokerage account. So you have sold stocks and then sold bonds and bought stocks. That is [(-) stocks plus (-) bonds plus (+) stocks], which works out to just selling bonds!

[The dark underbelly of fungibility is that you must calculate the after-tax equivalence to get your asset allocation the same as before, but that is complicated, and most don’t bother… But, of course, suppose you want to bother. In that case, you might decrease your brokerage account by your capital gains rate, your IRA by your effective tax rate, and then adjust your asset allocation accordingly, but your head might explode.]

But it is not the same if you are FORCED to take RMDs instead of choosing to take money from your brokerage account.

With RMDs, if you sell stocks low but don’t need the money, you can turn around and buy those same equities in your brokerage account with the liberated money.

The amount invested is actually decreased by your marginal tax bracket (rather than effective) as, since you don’t need the money for expenses, they are the last dollars out of your IRA. Moreover, since you are practicing good asset location hygiene, you don’t have bonds just sitting around in your brokerage account, which is fungible.

If I haven’t lost you by now, you are smarter than me.

But the long and the short of it: Since RMDs increase over time, even if you don’t need the money, you should have Safer Money in your IRA as you age. This is because you will never catch up when you are forced to sell equities low (and then pay marginal taxes on them) only to re-invest the money in a taxable brokerage account. Not fungible, even if we use after-tax equivalence.

Conclusion- RMD Asset Allocation Strategy

So, in summary, you need 1, 3, or 5 years of RMDs kept as safer money to prevent you from selling equities when they are down.

One year if you are extremely aggressive and don’t want a lot of cash and bonds in your IRA. One year of safer money is, of course, easy to calculate. If equities are up when you take your RMD, sell enough to meet your RMD and a little extra to account for the increase in RMD next year. Have one year of cash or bonds (or even long-term bonds) that slowly increases over time as your RMD increases.

If you are more moderate (and understand that this is, in toto, a super-aggressive strategy to begin with), you might have three years of RMDs in Safer Money.

If you are conservative, consider five years of Safer Money.

Here is what you need: (at the stated age, three years or five years of RMDs require this percentage in safer money)

AT 72

  • 3y 11.36%
  • 5y 19.65%

At 80

  • 3y 15.53%
  • 5y 27.14%

At 90

  • 3y 26.16%
  • 5y 46.60%

Even if you can tolerate a high equity allocation in retirement because you don’t need the money, you might want to decrease your asset allocation over time to prevent you from selling equities low.

This is the “Safer Money” in your IRA. Since you are forced to take the money out, it has a unique sequence risk as you age. As stated with incredible perspicacity, this is due to tax issues rather than fungibility concerns. (I’m happy to be proven incorrect on the topic.)

But beyond a point, there is a theoretical risk that you could wind up with less money if you are too aggressive in your IRA and don’t account for RMDs during a bear market.

So, we have decided that if you don’t need the RMDs, you can be pretty aggressive in your asset allocation during drawdown because all you need is the safer money.

Originally Posted in FiPhysician

Sound investments
don't happen alone

Find your crew, build teams, compete in VS MODE, and identify investment trends in our evergrowing investment ecosystem. You aren't on an island anymore, and our community is here to help you make informed decisions in a complex world.

More Reads
Am I investing for me or my kids?

Investing in retirement is all about tradeoffs. Of course, all decisions are tradeoffs—when you choose one path, you can’t go down the other—but let’s focus on retirement investing! What are the major tradeoffs you face when investing during retirement? Remember, this blog is for those who have oversaved for retirement. This is a safe space to discuss first-world problems! If you have oversaved for retirement, you need to decide on your asset allocation: how well do I sleep at night vs. how rich do I want the kids to be?

My Strategies For Dealing With a Down Stock Market

How do I handle my stock portfolio during a market downturn? How do I cope with seeing my stocks drop in value? Should I sell? Should I keep investing? These questions came up recently in the Simply Investing Forum. This blog post will answer these questions.

Market Musing 10-16-2022, Fed Fiasco 2022, Keep your hedges on

The SPX hit a 27.5% market correction last week. Why? Because Fed Chair Powell is forecasting another 100 to 125 basis points higher rate before the end of 2022.

Market Musing 10-10-2022, shots-fired-are-new-lows-on-deck

So good jobs data caused another market selloff. Why? Because Fed Chair Powell is forecasting another 100 to 125 basis points higher rate before the end of 2022.

Market Musing 10-04-2022, Is the Fed backed into a corner?

The Markets are bouncing off the hope that the Fed will slow down rate hikes. Fed Chair Powell is forecasting another 100 to 125 basis points higher rate before the end of 2022.

Still Within a Down Trend

stock market commentary

Cash Management for your Personal Finances

We often think about cash flow by looking in the rear-view mirror. What came in and went out last month or last year. Remember, the importance of building awareness

Goal Setting is About Process and Habits

Start reaching your financial goals by setting habits and processes

How Are NFTs Worth Money?

NFTs have been touted to just be pictures and nothing more. Find out in the article how NFTs are worth money.

Top Stocks for Beginners to try Right Now

Beginner stocks are investments a consumer will recognize that has a straightforward business model and proven stability

The Top Lifestyle Stocks to Buy Now

These are top lifestyle stocks to check out. These ideas come straight from the community

4 Estate Planning Actions You Should Stop Putting Off

Estate planning may seem like something to do later, but these 4 actions are easy to do and very important

Bottoming Or Lower ?

Stock Market Commentary

10 Steps to Take to Retire in 10 Years

Everyone dreams of retiring early. However, it usually stops there. If you are serious about early retirement, you need to consider what steps to take to make it happen. So, if you plan to stop working in the next decade, here are 10 steps to take to retire in the next 10 years.

What Is Indebtedness And How Do I Avoid It?

Many people have heard that indebtedness can lead to financial troubles. But what exactly is indebtedness, and how do you avoid it? Fortunately, the concept of indebtedness is pretty easy to understand.

The Positives and Negatives of Credit

Some people have short memories or perhaps they are just born optimists. The level of debt in the USA is growing at the fastest rate since the recession hit. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York has reported that the current level of consumer debt is $11.52 trillion higher than it was towards the end of the recession in 2011.

Start Tax Planning Now (and students, get your free money!)

Year-end tax planning in October? It is not too early, my friends.

Free Retirement Matching - The 401k Workplace Benefit

One of the things we're trying to accomplish here is empowering you and your family financially.

Protect yourself while actively trading

Amateur Investor Manipulation: Watch out if you’re actively trading on Robinhood

The Best Water Utilities that Pay Dividends

Water Utility stocks are great sources of dividends and can add more stability to an income portfolio

Resources for Publishers
Resources for New Investors

Boosted with BossCoin